Have
results? Fax them to Jim at 509-527-4959; email them to him at hansonjb@whitman.edu
Tournaments included are: Gonzaga, PLU, U Nevada Las
Vegas, Lewis and Clark, Idaho State, UPS.
View Results Tournament by Tournament,
Spring Semester
Spring Tournaments included: Clackamas, Western
Washington, UPS Free, Whitman 1, Whitman 2, Hatfields, Berkeley, USC,
Fullerton, NW CEDA Champs, UW NW Nov-Jr Champs.
View Results Tournament by
Tournament, Fall Semester
Fall Tournaments included: Gonzaga, PLU, Laramie
Warmup, Las Vegas, Idaho State, WNPT, Lewis and Clark, UPS.
View Results Tournament by
Tournament, Spring Semester
Spring Tournaments included: UPS Free, WWU, Rocky
Mtn (Parli only), Whitman Classic 1 and 2, Hatfields, Berkeley, Fullerton, USC,
NW CEDA Champs, UW, Spokane Falls
View Results Tournament by
Tournament, Fall Semester
Fall Tournaments included: Gonzaga, Reed, College
So. Idaho, Berkeley, Lewis and Clark, Pepperdine, College of Idaho, UPS, Lower
Columbia, Linfield, WNPT (Whitman November Policy), WSU-Vancouver
View Results Tournament by
Tournament, Fall Semester
Fall Tournaments included: Gonzaga, Reed, College So.
Idaho (but not novice parli), Berkeley Fall, Lewis and Clark, Pepperdine, UPS,
Lower Columbia (but not individual events and novice parli), Linfield, Whitman
November, Lewis and Clark Free (but not individual events), Northwest (but not
individual events, not jr/nov parli).
View Results Tournament by
Tournament, Spring 2006 Semester
Spring Tournaments include: USC, Fullerton,
Berkeley, Clackamas (but not parli), Pacific (but not parli), Oregon State (but
not IEs) WSCA-Whitman, Billings-Rimrocks.
View Results Tournament by
Tournament, Fall Semester
Fall Tournaments included: Willamette, Gonzaga,
Reed, PLU, Lewis and Clark, Pepperdine, UPS, Lewis-Clark State, Lower Columbia,
Linfield, U. Portland.
View Results Tournament by
Tournament, Spring 2006 Semester
Spring Tournaments include: USC, Fullerton,
Berkeley, Western Washington, Whitman, NW CEDA Champs, and Montana.
View Results Tournament by Tournament, Fall
2004 Semester
Fall
Tournaments included: Gonzaga, Reed, C. So. Idaho, Montana, Lewis and Clark,
Pepperdine, PLU, Lower Columbia, Linfield, Portland.
View Results Tournament by Tournament,
Spring 2005 Semester
Spring
Tournaments include USC, Fullerton, Weber, Berkeley, Utah, Columbia Basin,
Pacific, Oregon State, Whitman, Willamette.
The Northwest Sweepstakes System counts points for Northwest Schools from any Northwest tournament for
Parliamentary debate, Interp, and Speaking events, and any West Coast/Rockies tournament for Policy and NFA-LD debate.
· Tournaments must have at least 6 total debate rounds (eg 4 prelims with 2 elims).
· Tournaments must have at least 3 total rounds of an individual event to count (e.g. 2 prelims and finals) except in an individual event with 2 preliminary rounds that does not have enough contestants to justify a final round.
THERE ARE SEVEN CATEGORIES in which schools are recognized for their
top 4 performances in:
· POLICY
· PARLI
· DEBATE OVERALL
· INTERP
· SPEAKING EVENTS
· IES OVERALL
· OVERALL
WE RECOGNIZE 4 YEAR and CC SCHOOLS IN EACH CATEGORY.
Recognition is via announcement of school placings on our web page. If you wish a trophy, Jim Hanson would be glad to order you one at cost.
DEBATE POINTS
If a team advances to the first
elim (or going ABOVE 50% win-loss): 6 points
The team gets 1 point for each elim win
Multiply the above points using this scale:
2 teams in a division times .1
3 or 4 teams in a division times .2
5 or 6 teams in a division times .3
7 or 8 teams in a division times .4
9 or 10 teams in a division times .5
11 or 12 teams in a division times .6
13 or 14 teams in a division times .7
15 or 16 teams in a division times .8
after that, add .01 for each team over 16 except the number
should never exceed 1.
For example, if there are 25 teams in
junior parli—times .89
FOR A TOURNAMENT—TOURNAMENT POLICY DEBATE SCORE: Each School counts their top 4
scoring teams in policy debate at a tournament.
FOR A TOURNAMENT—TOURNAMENT PARLI DEBATE SCORE: Each School counts their top 4 scoring teams in parli debate at a tournament.
OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR—A SCHOOL’S POLICY DEBATE POINTS: Each School counts the top 4 tournament scores in policy debate
OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR—A SCHOOL’S PARLI DEBATE POINTS: Each School counts their top 4 tournament scores in parli debate.
OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR—A SCHOOL’S OVERALL DEBATE POINTS: Each School counts their top 4 policy and top 4 parli tournament scores.
IE POINTS
If a student advances to elims (or
averaging 2 or less in prelims): 3 points
3rd: 1 extra point
2nd: 2 extra points
1st: 3 extra points
BUT NOTE:
1. No more than the top 6 competitors can count in a division (e.g. a finals with 7 or more competitors—no points are counted for 7th place).
Example: There are 16 competitors; 8 advance to finals. You still only
count the top 6 winners.
2. If there are less than 12 competitors in a division, then only half the competitors can count in that division.
Example: There are 9 competitors; 5 advance to finals. You only count
the top 4 winners (5 is more than half of the competitors).
3. If there are no finals—count the top half of competitors up to the top 6.
Example: There are 11 competitors and no finals. You count the top 5
placing competitors.
Multiply the above points using this scale:
2 ie entries in that event and division times .2
3 ie entries in that event and division times .3
4 ie entries in that event and division times .4
5 ie entries in that event and division times .5
6 ie entries in that event and division times .6
7 or 8 ie entries in that event and division times .7
9 or 10 ie entries in that event and division times .8
after that, add .01 for each ie slot in that event and
division over 10 except the number should never exceed 1.
For example, if there are 25 ie slots in
novice impromptu—times .95
FOR A TOURNAMENT—TOURNAMENT INTERP SCORE: Each School counts their top 8 IE
Points in Interp at a tournament.
FOR A TOURNAMENT—TOURNAMENT PARLI DEBATE SCORE: Each School counts their top 8 IE Points in Speaking Events at a tournament.
OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR—A SCHOOL’S INTERP POINTS: Each School counts the top 4 tournament scores in interp.
OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR—A SCHOOL’S SPEAKING EVENT POINTS: Each School counts their top 4 tournament scores in speaking events.
OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR—A SCHOOL’S OVERALL INDIVIDUAL EVENT POINTS: Each School counts their top 4 interp and top 4 speaking event tournament scores.
OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR—A SCHOOL’S OVERALL POINTS: Each School counts their top 4 interp, top 4 speaking event, top 4 policy debate, and top 4 parli debate tournament scores.