Whitman Forensics Newsletter
Vol. 6, No. 1, December, 1999
|
Courtney,
Lauren, Mario, Denice, Thad, and Natalie share good times.
Nikki
and Emily like Ricky at the Team Party (or is that mock Ricky ?)! |
Prep Session Was Fun For All Whitman’s 1999-2000 season got off to a great start
with another fabulous prep session.
While old friends got reacquainted, those new to the team were quick
to find acceptance. Ultimate Frisbee
and volleyball games plus a team screening of the ever-popular movie “Ferris
Bueller’s Day Off” in Kimball Theater facilitated the team’s camaraderie. But perhaps one of the most
memorable parts of this year’s session was the food! Brian Simmonds, Emily Cordo and Keola
Whittaker were excellent chefs. Former
assistant David Kearney, visiting before he left for New York, liked the
curry dish so much that he dreamt of it all night long. However, all the meals did not
go off without problems. The BBQ night
had to be supplanted by pizza because Jim didn’t start the assembly of his
new gas grill—specially purchased for the occasion—until about 45 minutes
before it was scheduled to be used.
Gary and Geof eventually got the range assembled, but there were
several “extra” pieces. To our
knowledge, the grill has yet to be used which is most likely a good thing. |
||||
|
Becky
Galentine Becky Galentine fought cancer
for several years before passing away late last May. Becky was an inspiration to our team and to the
larger forensics community. She aggressively pushed our debaters to do
more work, to argue more strongly, and to connect with judges in ways we
hadn’t before. She was admired throughout the circuit, winning a coaching
award at the Heart of America tournament and being the namesake of an award
given by the CEDA national organization. She’ll be remembered by our team as
a coach who cared and fought for what she thought was important: our
debaters. |
Becky Galentine is shown here in 1997
when she took Sean Harris and Adam Symonds to the NDT. |
||||
|
Bob Withycombe relaxes in his office.
Bob continues to be a big supporter of the team. |
Whitman
Alone Atop the NFC With the first two Northwestern
Forensic Conference designated tournaments already completed, Whitman has a
comfortable lead over both PLU and Carroll.
PLU has amassed 214 points in the last two outings, and third place
Carroll College has 167 points. That leaves Whitman alone at
the top of the rankings with 235 points. The NFC champion is determined
by how well each team has done at the four designated tournaments each
year. To win, a school must be
successful in debate and individual events since both count for points toward
the trophy. The season is still far from
over, but if Whitman can build on its past achievements from this semester,
it appears to have a favorable future. |
||||
|
Jim
has a new Car? Not to be outdone by Dr.
Withycombe’s new car, and deciding that he needs a little more prestige than
his PhD was bringing, Jim also bought a new car. His old Geo was traded in for a shiny new Chrysler after a student
borrowed his car and had a most unfortunate accident. Fortunately no one was injured, but
when Jim returned from his trip to find the damage that others had wrought,
he was less then pleased. Thankfully, Jim’s mood was
satiated by the check from the insurance company as it enabled him to achieve
his goal of climbing the social ladder by purchasing the Chrysler Concorde.
However, he did opt out of the leather seat upgrade. As of yet, no one but Jim has
been allowed to drive the precious new vehicle which is probably a good idea
seeing that most of the mishaps in his old Prizm occurred when it was loaned
out to others. |
Jim stands by his new car. No
touchies! |
||||
|
Geof opens his present at the holiday
party. The 1999-2000
Staff Director
of Forensics, James Hanson; Assistant Director of Forensics, J.P. Lacy; Assistant Director of Forensics, Geof Brodak; Assistant, Policy Debate, Adam
Symonds; Assistant, Interpretation
Events, Kevin Loomer; Student
Assistant and Intramural Debate Coordinator, Abby St. Lawrence; Chair, Department of Rhetoric and Public
Address, Robert M. Withycombe; President,
Whitman College, Thomas E. Cronin |
Those
Quirky Coaches As with any group of people,
the more time you spend around them, the more their true personal habits show
through. With the forensics team, this
holds especially true. First, there is Jim. He has a truly “unique” taste in
music. From ABBA to Elton John to
Electric Light Orchestra, there are very few times a person could venture
into his office without hearing some of the worst music of any decade. But it is Jim’s driving that takes the
cake. He is the perfect get away
driver. This is because Jim can lose a
tail like no one’s business. And then there is J.P. The only thing that could rival his
addiction to Quake III—which he searched Walla Walla for the day of its
release—is his addiction to Nicorette gum.
He is never without it. But
atop Jeep’s list of quirks is the speed at which he goes through mice. Hardly a month goes by that he does not
return to the local Staples because “the old mouse is worn out.” Finally, there is Geof. He still has yet to confront the fact that
it is not other people that make his desk a total mess, at least if his
apartment is any indication. But his
ability to waste time truly makes him unique.
With Geof, procrastination is given a whole new definition. If it could possibly be put off till a
little later, Geof will find a way.
Then, he will be give you a very rational reason, in true parli form. The three coaches are some of the most divergent individuals imaginable. But somehow they can still keep the team together, which is a mystery for another day because it is not all together clear how they keep their own lives from falling to pieces. |
||||
|
JP and Jessica enjoy the holiday
party but they disagree on US sanctions policy toward Iraq. With whom do you
agree? 28 Fall
Competitors “We’ve
had 12 to 13 debate teams throughout the fall. We have one of the biggest
regularly traveling squads ever.” Jim Competitors,
Whitman Forensics, Fall 1999; Brant Olson, Brian Danielson, Brian Simmonds, Brian Ward, Charles Olney, Courtney
Gardner, Denice Kelley, Emily Cordo, Gabe McGuire, Gary VanDenBerg, Ian
Danforth, Jenny Burgess, Jessica Clarke, Kelly Schultz, Keola Whittaker,
Lauren Ritter, Mario Cava, Mark Lanning, Meredith Johnson, Natalie Havlina, Nicholas Thomas, Noa Piper,
Richard Detheridge, Scott Daniel, Thad Blank, Todd Borden, Tony Torres, and
Wanjiru Kamau.
Charles, Brian, and Brant smile as
Jim shows off the pajamas he received as a gift at the holiday party. |
Opposing
Views On US Sanctions on Iraq A
Reason To Lift The Sanctions (Jessica’s position) The United States attempts to justify its foreign
policy toward Iraq by arguing that Saddam Hussein needs to be stopped because
of his previous human rights record and his tendency toward international
belligerence. However, nine years of
sanctions have been entirely ineffective in making Saddam toe the
international line. Instead, millions
of innocent Iraqi citizen are relegated to poverty and famine like conditions
because our sanctions regime prevents international goods from entering the
country. As many as 7,000 children die every month as a direct
result of US foreign policy. Some have touted the “oil for food” program as a
way to mitigate the damage wrought upon these innocents. However, this program is not dealing with
the problem. It is not sufficiently funded, and Iraq’s ability to pump oil is
significantly hampered by its inability to repair its oil pumps and
refineries because the sanctions prevent spare parts from entering. Additionally, Iraq cannot repair the damage
its infrastructure suffered during the Gulf War because the sanctions block
needed supplies. Even with a more
effective “oil for food” program, more people would not get food simply
because there is no way to get it to them. Thus, the US must lift the sanctions as soon as
possible. Whatever our feelings are
toward Saddam, that is not a reason to withhold food from hundreds of
thousands of innocent people. If the US were to reverse its
stance on Iraq, food and technology to repair the country would flow in while
international support for our policy toward Iraq would increase from its
wavering current status. And
maybe Iraq would be more willing to work with the international community
when we stop shunning it and start embracing it. A
Reason To Keep The Sanctions In Place (J.P.’s position) The plight of hungry children is a horrible thing
and should not be ignored. But what
many don’t realize is that people would still starve if the sanctions were
lifted. The reason is simple: Saddam has no interest in feeding his people or helping others do it
for him. The best examples of
this are the massive palaces he has built for his cadre of supporters in the
recent years, all the while telling the world that Iraq was too poor to feed
its people. And little would change if
the sanctions were lifted. Since Saddam’s grip of the country is absolute, he
would be the only one to benefit. If
the sanctions were lifted, Saddam would be under no obligation to buy food or
repair the infrastructure. He would, however, have the money
to repair his military and to build up his weapons of mass destruction
programs. Clearly, “oil for food” is not a perfect program,
but at least it gets food into the country and not the technology that will
allow Saddam to increase his military power even more. The international community and the United
States should do what it can to help the people that Saddam won’t. Let’s make sure that the international aid
helps the people who really need it, not Saddam’s military. |
||||
|
Nationally
Honored IM Debate Season Starts Up Again This season of Intramural
Debate continues its history of excellence. Sean Collins has won the
experienced division both times this semester and is well on his way to
sweeping the season. But Akshay Garg,
Sean Butler, and Tony Torres are all prepared to stop him since they too have
qualified for the championship tournament. In the inexperienced division
the competition is especially fierce.
At the first tournament, David Messer took first; Amy Benton took
second; and Tom Luce, Helena Durst, Melissa Orsan, and Nathan Manni tied for
third. At the second fall tournament, Rachel Dryden and Becky Thiebes tied
for first place honors and Peter Lewicki, Max Wall and Nathan Manni all tied
for third. |
|||||
|
Thad Blank gets some shuteye in one of the prep rooms—a popular practice on the team. |
Sean Collins has won the IM
experienced division both times this fall! |
||||
|
Hey—Are
you getting enough sleep? The Pioneer, way back in
1932, wrote an article about the debaters’ work ethic. It described how, long after the campus
shut down, debaters worked into the night getting ready for their next
contest. It would seem, however, that
this year’s squad has taken that tendency to an entirely new level. Now debaters are often seen
well into the night, and even the next morning! Some have even taken up the habit of
sleeping in the debate offices instead of going home to their dorms. And if you couldn’t imagine something more
extreme, consider the case of Charles Olney.
He has brought in a foam mat and a sleeping bag so that he can rest
even more easily. According to him,
this makes sense because “I
could go home, but sleeping here is more efficient.” Apparently, cutting cards has truly been
taken to a new level. Thad Blank,
Emily Cordo, Nicholas Thomas, Jessica Clarke, and others are doing it too.
The students of the 30s would certainly be proud. |
|||||
|
Party
Review – The Holiday Blow Out The annual holiday party was
not entirely characterized by the sprit of giving this year. At the white elephant exchange, teammates
took gifts from each other to get exactly what they wanted. As a result, some of the most popular items
switched hands several times. Among the list of most desired
gifts by competitors and coaches alike were a Quake doll, a Star Wars Legos
set, and a “large” squirt gun. However, the desire for
material things was not the only thing that drew the team together. The
promise of some great food also enticed team members. There was a wide assortment of chips, dips,
and tasty beverages but it was Jim’s grilled prawns that stole the show. In true holiday form, there was
an exceedingly jovial atmosphere simply because this was the last chance for
the whole team to be together before this semester ends. Enthusiasm and camaraderie dominated the
evening. There is just something about
this time of year that makes people take stock in what is really
important. The team showed their
appreciation by giving each coach a gift. |
|
||||
|
An
Argument For Trans-racial Adoptions Prepared by Denice Kelley and based on her
persuasive speech America has a fear of multi-racial families that
is keeping children from being adopted by families of a different race. The child welfare system encompasses over
500,000 children, 60% of which are minorities. However the number of trans-racial adoptions has dwindled to
less than 1,000 a year, leaving hundreds of thousands of minority children
parentless. The courts and
social workers have perpetuated this problem by ruling against trans-racial adoptions
and instituting state adoption laws that support race matching. The cause of this fear of multi-racial families
was started when the National Association of Black Social Workers wrote a
position paper against trans-racial adoption.
They believed that trans-racial adoption would cause black children to
lose their racial identity. These
fears have grown and become the direct cause of the negative attitude towards
trans-racial adoption. However, there is a solution. Currently, adoption advocacy groups, such
as the New York State's Citizen's Coalition for Children are working on
convincing the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to act by
withholding federal funds from states that have race-matching policies. By joining these advocacy groups and
raising our voices collectively we can start to alleviate this fear of
multi-racial families, giving children the home they need. |
Denice Kelley is competing with a
persuasive speech to promote trans-racial adoptions. What’s your opinion? |
||||
|
Withycombe
and Walker Funds Contributions Thanks for your contributions to these speech and funds!
Generous donors since June 1, 1999 include: Jennifer Becker
(’94), Andy Backlund (’96), R. Paul Beveridge (’83), Kelly Cleman (’87),
Mathew Cleman (’87), Beverly Hanson, Robert Hanson, Lysle Wilhelmi (’84),
Robert Withycombe, John Miller (’70), Brent Northup (’68), Sue Northup (’68),
and Steve Rowe (’96). Contributions to
the Walker Fund or the Withycombe Fund should be sent to: Annual Fund Office Whitman College Walla Walla WA 99362 Checks
should be made out to Whitman College with a note that says to place the
contribution into the Walker or Withycombe Fund. |
Alum picture from ’94: Kristofer
Peterson, Loan Lam, and Nicole Levin (Matarelli). |
||||||
|
Emily
Cordo and Courtney Gardner share good moments at the Lewis and Clark
tournament.
Jenni
Burgess has been a big winner in individual events—winning three first
places! |
The
Team Continues Its Winning Tradition Without a doubt, it is hard to
top the 1999 CEDA National Championship that Jessica and Adam won but this
year’s debaters are sure giving it a try.
Led by strong returning competitors, Whitman debate is cleaning up in
not only policy, but in parli and LD and individual events too. Big winners
include the awards listed below: POLICY: The Policy squad has
already seen many successes and its depth is beginning to show including
first place showings at the Western Scrimmage and the University of Oregon by
Jessica Clarke and Charles Olney, as well as Brian Ward and Keola Whittaker
and Scott Daniel and Nicholas Thomas at Oregon. NFA LD: Our NFA LD debaters, Brian
Simmonds and Brant Olson, were the runner up and fifth place winner at the
Air Force tournament. Not too bad for
their first time out. PARLI: The season started off with
a bang with Todd Borden and Gabe McGuire’s second place finish at Lewis &
Clarke and Jenni Burgess’ top place speaker award. Denice Kelley and Mark Lanning won the
novice division and Ian Danforth was junior division best speaker at the
University of Oregon. INDIVIDUAL EVENTS: Whitman has done extremely
well; bringing home twenty awards including six first place finishes! Lead by newcomer Jenni Burgess—who twice
won senior impromptu—Whitman has made its presence felt in limited prep
events. In Impromptu, the trio of Mark Lanning, Gabe McGuire, and Jenni
Burgess won all three divisions at Lewis & Clark. At the University of
Oregon, Brian Danielson improved upon his finalist award and took second in
junior impromptu followed by Mark Lanning in third. Extemporaneous speaking
is also a good event for Whitman. At
Lewis & Clark, Gary VanDenBerg was the junior champion, and Meredith
Johnson and Courtney Gardner took the top two slots in novice respectively. |
||||||
|
Policy Awards Overall 1st, Western
Scrimmage; 2nd, Lewis and Clark; 1st, U. Oregon Jessica Clarke and Charles
Olney 1st,
Western Scrimmage; 2nd, Lewis & Clark; 1st, U.
Oregon; 17th, Wake Forest Courtney Gardner and Emily
Cordo 5th,
Lewis and Clark; 5th, U. Oregon Brian Simmonds and Thad
Blank 5th,
Western Scrimmage, 5th, U. Oregon Nicholas Thomas and Scott
Daniel 1st,
U. Oregon Keola Whittaker and Brian
Ward 5th,
Lewis and Clark; 1st, U Oregon |
Parli
Awards Overall 2nd, Lewis & Clark Brant Olson and Jenni
Burgess: 9th,
Lewis & Clark; 9th, U. Oregon Gary VanDenBerg and Brian
Danielson: 9th,
U. Oregon Todd Borden and Gabe
McGuire: 2nd,
Lewis and Clark Denice Kelley and Mark
Lanning: 1st,
U. Oregon Brant
Olson and Maggie Malone: 9th, Air Force |
Individual Events Awards Brian
Danielson:
Junior Impromptu: Finalist, Lewis and Clark, 2nd, U. Oregon Brian
Simmonds:
NFA LD, 2nd, Air Force Brant Olson: NFA LD, 5th, Air Force Courtney Gardner: Novice Extemp, 2nd,
Lewis and Clark Gabe McGuire: Junior Extemp, 3rd,
Lewis and Clark; Junior Impromptu: 1st, Lewis and Clark Gary
VanDenBerg:
Junior Extemp: 1st, Lewis & Clark; Finalist, U. Oregon Ian Danforth: Junior Impromptu, 3rd, U. Oregon Jenni Burgess: Senior Impromptu, 1st, U. Oregon
and Lewis and Clark, and Senior Extemp, Finalist, Lewis and Clark; 1st,
U. Oregon Mark Lanning: Novice Impromptu, 1st,
Lewis and Clark; 3rd, U. Oregon Meredith Johnson: Novice Extemp, 1st,
Lewis and Clark Natalie Havlina: Novice Extemp, Finalist, U. Oregon |
|||||
|
|
Jenni, Richard, Mark, and Ian show
off their gifts from the holiday party. |
|
Gabe studies while at the University
of Oregon tournament. You can see Todd, Natalie, Ian, Denice, Brian, and Gary
in the background. |
||||