
Every year the policy debate
community uses the resolution to teach participants an incredible amount about
a particular governmental policy and its philosophical justifications. In my
time in the activity I have learned about privacy policy, ocean policy,
non-proliferation policy, energy conservation and US policy towards china. But
more so than for what it teaches about the particular topic for the season,
debate is important because of the lifelong lesson it teaches to its
participants that nothing is beyond question: tolerance or intolerance, faith
or science, reason or emotion, nationalism or pacifism; all of these are
concepts that are within question and up for debate. And in this age of political and intellectual
stagnation, that lesson and the passion that college debate instills in its
participants may be the only things that can re-invigorate political engagement
and meaningful philosophical questioning and save academia and this generation
from their constantly filling graves of anachronism and passivity.

I have participated in policy debate for 8 years
and the activity has provided a framework for me to be able to excel in my
classes by giving me advanced organization, communication, and research skills
that allows me to more critically examine academic texts and formulate
arguments to more effectively engage in classroom discussion. In addition,
policy debate on a national level tends to be more male-dominated and the
experience and skills I have learned on the Whitman Policy debate program has
and will continue to help me as a woman to survive in a more male-dominated
field such as law. Policy debate has also expanded my mind in a way that is
hard to articulate on paper, it has made me see that there is more than
one-side to an issue and it has forced me to understand and respect the very
process of argumentation and persuasion. Finally, policy debate has made me a
more organized and better public speaker and has taught me how to adapt to
people’s personalities, learning, and life-styles, a skill that has allowed me
to more inclusive to people’s differences.

Debate is
educational primarily because of the way it makes you think. Sure, I’ve
learned plenty about the People’s Republic of China, the workings of the United
State Supreme Court, and domestic energy policy, but the factual knowledge that
I have learned through research and discussion is not nearly as valuable as the
way that debate has taught me to analyze arguments. Debate forces you to think
fast and dissect an argument to find out where its weaknesses are. The ability
to see through rhetoric into the heart of a claim and the logic on which it
rests has been invaluable in writing papers and critically analyzing texts for
my other classes.

Policy debate has been an important
educational experience despite the fact that my choice to be a chemistry major
differs from the typical debate major.
The public speaking skills that I have developed will be essential when
presenting my research in large public forums.
It has also instilled an ability to be articulate on the spot which is a
rare skill in much of the science world.
These skills not only make me a better rounded student, but they will
also be essential for exploring career opportunities that would not be
available without debate. This activity
has also allowed me to experience a greater exposure to disciplines outside of
my major. I am able understand and
participate in discussions in my philosophy class regarding theories that I
have never taken classes about, but have experienced to a similar depth in
debate. This has allowed me to easily
take upper level philosophy courses without taking any beginning level courses,
something that would be very difficult without my educational experience in
debate.

"It's
rather ironic, because I first joined debate in high school to avoid work. My
parents said I could pick between debate and English, and I just wanted to
avoid heavy reading. I'm not sure if there's any way in which I could have been
more wrong though. Debate has taught me to do more research in a week than I
could have accomplished in a month prior to joining. Even ignoring the ways in
which using the program’s document template have vastly increased my ability to
use MS Word effectively, I'm exposed to more facts about more different topics
in a couple days of research than many student pull from a one semester class.
Just in my freshman year I've learned the importance of stare decisis in our
judicial system, the specific advantages of amending the constitution under
section 5 of the constitution, as opposed to through a constitutional
convention, and the detailed history and implications of four landmark court
cases (US v. Morrison, Ex Parte Quirin, Milliken v. Bradley, and Planned
Parenthood v. Casey)."

Policy debate
has been essential to my educational experience at Whitman. Unlike traditional
classes where teachers have set up a curriculum with strict guidelines, policy
debates forces a student to direct their own research including a diverse
groups of sources, factual and theoretical concerns, and practical/concrete
political analysis. For a student who struggles with writing and oral
presentation (along with learning disabilities), debate has been integral in
building confidence and strengthening my skills. Frequently, a debater must
coherently and clearly develop forceful arguments without much to go on in a
way that never occurs in the traditional classroom environment. Never in my
entire Whitman experience have I found peers as competent at swiftly and
thoroughly analyzing such a wide variety of problems as in debate. Professors
regularly look forward to debaters in their classes and I have even been sought
out before by professors who want me to encourage debaters to take their
classes or become their advisees because of their unique skills. I truly
believe that, more than any other program at Whitman, policy debate benefited
me in ways that I can apply throughout my life.